Wednesday, 7 August 2013

The Fear of Having a Daughter

Catherine Rampell cited, in an article for New York Times.com, many interesting statistics and facts that showed Americans preferred to have a boy child over a girl child. Yet her last phrase is possibly the most revealing when it comes to the subtle underlying drive to prefer a boy; fear.


“Or maybe some other risks that come with having a daughter — such as unplanned pregnancies — weigh heavier in Americans’ minds when thinking about this question.”


The fear that a girl child will come home with an unplanned, probably unwanted pregnancy is something that the North American culture is utterly afraid of. This fear is not a secret, in fact this fear is hidden in plain sight. Not unlike subtle racism, the fear of having a girl child is embedded in our culture through popular sayings, misconceptions, stereotypes, media coverage and urban legends. There is fear for girls, of girls and certainly a deep-rooted fear for having a girl child. The fear is not with having a girl child herself, the fear is in the physical abuse that girl child will probably encounter in her lifetime. Every rape, every attack, every abduction, pimp and even every boyfriend she may ever have plagues our society with the birth of every daughter. It is this same fear that causes mothers and fathers and non-parents alike to utter phrases like, “I'd rather have a boy; you only have to worry about one prick on the block.” This thinking implies that girl children are not safe outside the home because the block they live on is probably filled with sexual predators. The fear in that statement also implies that boy children will inevitably grow up to be these same sexual predators that parents of girl children are so afraid of.


This fear for girl children comes from the absurd and archaic belief that men are beasts, animals who simply cannot control themselves or their sexual urges. Which we all know as untrue. The majority of men today are kind, loving and respectful. Yet the popularly used phrase, “boy will be boys,” describes and dismisses negative behaviour as seen in boys, and reinforces this contemptible fear that they cannot control themselves nor behave properly. This mindset also reinforces the idea that the man's right to sexual release is more important and more valued than the sexual health and well-being of women and girls. This fear also perpetuates the thinking that women and girls have no sexuality, and if they do women and girls should be and must remain controlled and pure in their actions. Yet how can we as a society hold the dual and opposing belief that men are uncontrollably sexual and women are chaste beings with no sexual drive to speak of? This duality reinforces rape culture because under that belief how could any woman agree to or even want something like consensual sex, which, under that same belief, is exclusively men's, not women's. This unattainable and unsustainable fear-based duality is further confused by the over-sexualization of women and girls in the media. The media goes so far to imply that women and girls are there for sexual reasons and that men should think of them in a sexual way.


Wait, so let me get this straight, we believe, as a society, however subtle, that men are uncontrollable sexual predators with a right to have sex with women but those same women should remain pure and chaste, even when we parade them around half naked in public and on TV? Yes. That's exactly what we believe. But no one will ever dare come right out and say it. They're all more comfortable just wishing for the birth of a boy.


The birth of a girl child marked with this hidden, but real fear, leads to a continued vulnerability throughout her life. According to dosomething.org “someone in the US is sexually assaulted every 2 minutes.” It also states that “1 out of every 6 women in America has been the victim of an attempted or rape in her lifetime.” No wonder expecting parents are afraid to have a girl! No parent would wish such horrors on any child.  The problem is, like subtle racism, this fear is rarely acknowledged nor understood. How can we begin to bring about a solution to this issue if we refuse to see it for the danger it is? We have all done an amazing job keeping this fear unnoticed. I believe it's because no one wants to admit being a part of this subtle sexism. However, we continue to fight for women's rights, both at home and abroad which means we recognize that there is a problem, a threat to women, that needs to be addressed and confronted. We also understand the need to continue to move towards gender fairness, especially in these modern times. But until we change the dual thinking that leads to fear of the birth of a daughter, the safety of our girls and women will continue to remain in jeopardy. We will only continue to fight symptoms of a much greater and deeply hidden problem. The desire to have a boy child may seem inconsequential but the reality of it's existence perpetuates the myths of men's and women's sexuality and causes discreetly distinct damage to the fight for equality between men and women.


So what can we do? Some believe that the fight for equality and women's issues are for women to deal with alone. Again, this dual thinking that women's issues are for women alone proves irresponsible and detrimental to the progress made by the women's movement.  The right to safety is something men and women have in common.  Will we continue to raise our boys with the context that they are doomed to become sexual predators demanding sexual release from any or every women they encounter? And raise our daughters with fear and worry that she will be taken advantage of all the while doing nothing about the problem?  Or will we raise our children to become respectful, kind, loving, fair people? Our fear of having daughters imperceptibly continues to create a place in our society where sexual abuse and assault on women is acceptable, even expected. If we ever have a hope to end the violence against women it lies in the jokes we repeat, the myths we indulge in, how we think, what we say and how we raise our children.


Tuesday, 11 June 2013

Quran-based defence?

Chiheb Esseghaier was a graduate student who has been living in Quebec.  According to his LinkedIn profile, he has a PhD that he's been working on, in Canada, since 2008.  He has his BA of Engineering and received his Masters Degree in Industrial Biotechnology.  He is familiar with Powder X-ray Diffraction, Microfabrication, and Molecular Biology.  He has published many academic papers, and one of his areas of research was HIV antiviral drugs.  


At first glance Esseghaier seems to be an intelligent, community minded man who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of science.  He has lectured at conferences, sharing and spreading his ideas to minds eager to learn from him and his extensive knowledge.


Mr. Esseghaier, was arrested on April 22 following an eight-month RCMP investigation. He was charged with conspiracy to commit murder in association with a terrorist group.  He was found, with accomplices, to be plotting to derail a VIA rail passenger train.  Many innocent and unknowing people lives were in his scope of horror.  


According to the Toronto Sun, Esseghaier told Toronto court Wednesday morning that he "doesn't recognize the Criminal Code under which he faces five serious charges."
“Because all of those conclusions [were] taken ... based on Criminal Code and ... we know that this Criminal Code is not holy book, it’s just written by set of creations and the creations they’re not perfect because only the Creator is perfect so if we are basing our judgment ... we cannot rely on the conclusions taken out from these judgments” Esseghaier said in his first Toronto appearance.


Basically he denounced Canada's Criminal Code and wished to be governed by his holy book, the Qur’an.  


“I have agreed to have a lawyer, no problem, but I wish that this lawyer will cooperate with me,” he said. “I need the holy book as a reference for my judgment I don’t want a book written by humans.”


This is directly quoted by a man who had dedicated most of his adult life to studying science discovered and written by mere humans.  His refusal to representation may result in him representing himself.  Even though, accused criminals can’t just opt out of the law, Esseghaier is certainly going to try.


It seems to me that his denial of Canadian Law is a direct reference to his guilt.  Any innocent party would never disguise the truth so blatantly as to discount the law of the country in place of a personal holy book.  However, this raises scary questions about multi-culturalism and how far is too far.  Canada has relented some rules to accommodate, as best they can, special Muslim cases, while still remaining in the full scope of the law. But those exceptions were mostly regarding Muslim women's head scarves.


Richard Moon, a University of Windsor professor who studies law and freedom of religion reminds us that, "one can’t accommodate something that basically says Canadian law is ... not applicable.”


David Butt, a lawyer who represented a Muslim woman in court said, “If a judge making a law were to reach out to a particular religious document … and say: ‘I’m pronouncing this to be the governing legal principle,’ that would be perceived as a radical [change].”


Kimberley Motley, a lawyer who works primarily in Afghanistan, suggested that Esseghaier use the Qur’an along with Canada’s Criminal Code, as a supplementary document that the judge might consider.


Why should a judge even consider supplementary documents for a judgment in a court of law?  This implies that our laws are incomplete, ineffective, useless.  


Tahir Gora, director general of Progressive Muslims Institute Canada says, “He (places) no value (on) civil and liberal democratic rights, and (yet) he was enjoying those rights.”


This is not the first time Sharia Law was proposed in Canada when dealing with Muslim criminals. Five years ago, Premier Dalton McGuinty announced, “There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians.”


The suggested use of Sharia Law created havoc.  Media reports of abuse against mainly women in other parts of the world provoked women's groups in Ontario to become outraged at the prospect of "Islamic tribunals ruling on the basis of sharia law" as it threatened women's rights to equality. 


How long now before Canadian Law doesn't exist?  How long now before we're all governed under Sharia Law?  With more and more immigrants coming in from all corners of the globe, now is not the time to demur and hand over our rights.  How long will we keep quiet while Esseghaier convinces a judge that it is his right under the Qur’an to plot the murder of hundreds of unsuspecting Canadians?  He has already used our educational system, spread his ideals to young, indulgent minds, and is now balking from judgment as he claims it's not holy.  How far do we bend?  How much do we give?  How accommodating can we be before we are unrecognizable?  


Anver Emon, a University of Toronto law professor and author of the recent book on religious pluralism, said, “It may absolutely have no merits whatsoever, but I do think we as a society, however it is that you want to define the ‘we’ … we have to stand back in the multicultural setting and remember that, what we seem to take for granted, what we imagine to be self-evident, we now have to justify.”


I ask you now, must we justify justice?  The laws of the country were created to keep us all safe from men like Esseghaier.  We cannot afford to keep quiet while Sharia Law is being practiced here on our land.  Immigrants come here to get away from persecution.  We embrace others and share our cultures.  We provide solace and shelter for the abused, the displaced and provide opportunity for a better life to those seeking betterment.  I am proud to belong to a multi-cultural country, just not at the expense of what's right.  



MSN.com News: Qur'an-based defence too challenging even for Muslim lawyers
Chiheb Esseghaier: LinkedIn 
Heavy.com News: 5 Fast Facts on Chiheb Esseghaier
TheStar.com News: Law vs Religion 
TheStar.com: ON rule against Sharia Law





Chiheb Esseghaier was a graduate student who has been living in Quebec.  According to his LinkedIn profile, he has a PhD that he's been working on, in Canada, since 2008.  He has his BA of Engineering and received his Masters Degree in Industrial Biotechnology.  He is familiar with Powder X-ray Diffraction, Microfabrication, and Molecular Biology.  He has published many academic papers, and one of his areas of research was HIV antiviral drugs.  


At first glance Esseghaier seems to be an intelligent, community minded man who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of science.  He has lectured at conferences, sharing and spreading his ideas to minds eager to learn from him and his extensive knowledge.


Mr. Esseghaier, was arrested on April 22 following an eight-month RCMP investigation. He was charged with conspiracy to commit murder in association with a terrorist group.  He was found, with accomplices, to be plotting to derail a VIA rail passenger train.  Many innocent and unknowing people lives were in his scope of horror.  


According to the Toronto Sun, Esseghaier told Toronto court Wednesday morning that he "doesn't recognize the Criminal Code under which he faces five serious charges."
“Because all of those conclusions [were] taken ... based on Criminal Code and ... we know that this Criminal Code is not holy book, it’s just written by set of creations and the creations they’re not perfect because only the Creator is perfect so if we are basing our judgment ... we cannot rely on the conclusions taken out from these judgments” Esseghaier said in his first Toronto appearance.


Basically he denounced Canada's Criminal Code and wished to be governed by his holy book, the Qur’an.  


“I have agreed to have a lawyer, no problem, but I wish that this lawyer will cooperate with me,” he said. “I need the holy book as a reference for my judgment I don’t want a book written by humans.”


This is directly quoted by a man who had dedicated most of his adult life to studying science discovered and written by mere humans.  His refusal to representation may result in him representing himself.  Even though, accused criminals can’t just opt out of the law, Esseghaier is certainly going to try.


It seems to me that his denial of Canadian Law is a direct reference to his guilt.  Any innocent party would never disguise the truth so blatantly as to discount the law of the country in place of a personal holy book.  However, this raises scary questions about multi-culturalism and how far is too far.  Canada has relented some rules to accommodate, as best they can, special Muslim cases, while still remaining in the full scope of the law. But those exceptions were mostly regarding Muslim women's head scarves.


Richard Moon, a University of Windsor professor who studies law and freedom of religion reminds us that, "one can’t accommodate something that basically says Canadian law is ... not applicable.”


David Butt, a lawyer who represented a Muslim woman in court said, “If a judge making a law were to reach out to a particular religious document … and say: ‘I’m pronouncing this to be the governing legal principle,’ that would be perceived as a radical [change].”


Kimberley Motley, a lawyer who works primarily in Afghanistan, suggested that Esseghaier use the Qur’an along with Canada’s Criminal Code, as a supplementary document that the judge might consider.


Why should a judge even consider supplementary documents for a judgment in a court of law?  This implies that our laws are incomplete, ineffective, useless.  


Tahir Gora, director general of Progressive Muslims Institute Canada says, “He (places) no value (on) civil and liberal democratic rights, and (yet) he was enjoying those rights.”


This is not the first time Sharia Law was proposed in Canada when dealing with Muslim criminals. Five years ago, Premier Dalton McGuinty announced, “There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians.”


The suggested use of Sharia Law created havoc.  Media reports of abuse against mainly women in other parts of the world provoked women's groups in Ontario to become outraged at the prospect of "Islamic tribunals ruling on the basis of sharia law" as it threatened women's rights to equality. 


How long now before Canadian Law doesn't exist?  How long now before we're all governed under Sharia Law?  With more and more immigrants coming in from all corners of the globe, now is not the time to demur and hand over our rights.  How long will we keep quiet while Esseghaier convinces a judge that it is his right under the Qur’an to plot the murder of hundreds of unsuspecting Canadians?  He has already used our educational system, spread his ideals to young, indulgent minds, and is now balking from judgment as he claims it's not holy.  How far do we bend?  How much do we give?  How accommodating can we be before we are unrecognizable?  


Anver Emon, a University of Toronto law professor and author of the recent book on religious pluralism, said, “It may absolutely have no merits whatsoever, but I do think we as a society, however it is that you want to define the ‘we’ … we have to stand back in the multicultural setting and remember that, what we seem to take for granted, what we imagine to be self-evident, we now have to justify.”


I ask you now, must we justify justice?  The laws of the country were created to keep us all safe from men like Esseghaier.  We cannot afford to keep quiet while Sharia Law is being practiced here on our land.  Immigrants come here to get away from persecution.  We embrace others and share our cultures.  We provide solace and shelter for the abused, the displaced and provide opportunity for a better life to those seeking betterment.  I am proud to belong to a multi-cultural country, just not at the expense of what's right.  



MSN.com News: Qur'an-based defence too challenging even for Muslim lawyers
Chiheb Esseghaier: LinkedIn 
Heavy.com News: 5 Fast Facts on Chiheb Esseghaier
TheStar.com News: Law vs Religion 
TheStar.com: ON rule against Sharia Law





Why I rant...

How can we not rant?  With so much hurt, pain, anger, agony, jealousy, irrationality, violence, unfairness, rudeness, and plain old stupidity in our world, I ask you again, how can we not rant??

We rant when we are not in control.  We feel powerless, so we use our voices to help relieve the tension inside of us.  When we rant, we believe that just saying the words out loud can help change things.  Maybe it doesn't change anything, but maybe it does. 
If our words are heard, then ideas may spread.  If ideas spread, maybe someone else, who does have some control, can do something about it.  If somebody does something about it, maybe some good will come of it.  Our world can be a better place, we just have to start paying attention!

As Rick Mercer states in his report for Macleans magazine, Why I Rant, "Everyone should rant.  Ranting not only makes you feel better but occasionally...you might just get results - justice, satisfaction..."

He goes on to state that "Canadians don't rant enough."  The danger, however, is fierce.

"If we as a nation don't rant then the powers that be will use that complacency against us."

The problem?  "People don't care."

HOW CAN WE NOT CARE?

Our world is falling into the hands of the greedy, the rich, the powerful, the sneaky, the evil, and day after day, we do nothing.  We stand by while beautiful, promising, young girls are bullied to death.  We sit on our couches while war rages mercilessly leaving slaughtered bodies to the flies.  We eat our dinner and have a beer while governments across our planet cheat and lie and steal from us; making it harder and harder for us to live a decent life, while they count their millions and laugh at our reluctance to stop them.  

How can we not rant?  Are we afraid of the consequences?  Are we afraid someone will notice us?  Are we afraid we'll be in some sort of danger because of what we say?  It's easier to stay quiet.  It's easier to bury ourselves under excuses than take a stand for what is right.

As murky as it is lately, we still have the freedom of speech.  It is a right, a privilege, denied to many, and even though we have the ability to stand up and speak out, we are silent.  We allow the evils of this world to take over; our countries, our governments, our families, ourselves.  By staying silent we are saying it's OK.  By keeping to ourselves we are essentially saying we agree with what's going on.

Edmund Burke tells us plainly, "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

I, for one, refuse to sit by and watch our world fall apart.  I, for one, refuse to allow evil to consume all that is good.  I, for one, know that all it takes is a dash of courage and a pinch of passion.  I, for one, plan to help focus us back to what's right.  I, for one, will do something about this!  

Who's with me?


"When good men do nothing." Click here if you want to read more. Website credited to Wayne Greeson